MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Glycerol Concentration Monitoring Using High-resolution Non-contact RF Sensor

2020· article· en· W3112312152 on OpenAlexaff
Zahra Abbasi, Masoud Baghelani, Mojgan Daneshmand

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlycerolAmplifierSensitivity (control systems)ResonatorMicrowaveResolution (logic)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceHigh resolutionChemistryPhysicsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsChromatographyElectronic engineeringRemote sensingTelecommunicationsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel high-resolution non-contact real-time method for glycerol concentration measurement has been proposed. Glycerol concentration is an important biomarker for many diagnostic applications, such as indication of hyperglyceridemia. The proposed sensing platform is based on a loss-compensated chipless tag that is coupled to the reader resonator and active feedback loop. The reader is designed at 2.6 GHz coupled to an active microwave amplifier to compensate and the tag is designed at 1.6 GHz which is located at 2.5 mm vertical distance from the reader. The high level of sensitivity of the highresolution tag resonance makes it suitable for low concentration and small variation chemical sensing. The proposed disposable sensor demonstrates a frequency shift of 36.4 kHz when the concentration of glycerol in deionized (DI) water changes from 122 mg.lit <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> to 0 mg.lit <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> which highlights the capability of glycerol concentration sensing in the human body range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207