MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112352364

Coherent control of Bloch oscillations by means of optical pulse shaping

2004· article· en· W3112352364 on OpenAlexaff
Riccardo Fanciulli, Andrew M. Weiner, Marc M. Dignam, D. Meinhold, Karl Leo

Bibliographic record

VenuePublikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTerahertz technology and applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWave packetBloch oscillationsPhysicsSuperposition principleSuperlatticeCoherent controlUltrashort pulsePulse shapingFour-wave mixingPulse (music)Polarization (electrochemistry)OpticsCondensed matter physicsLaserAtomic physicsNonlinear opticsQuantum mechanicsChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show full control over the coherent dynamics of an electron undergoing Bloch oscillations in a superlattice. By shaping the exciting laser pulse appropriately we can control the subsequent dynamics of these electrons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft)Same topicTerahertz technology and applicationsFrench-language works237,207