MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3112421517 · doi:10.22067/econg.v11i3.68921

کانه زایی، کانی شناسی، ساخت و بافت و ژنز کانسار سرب و روی اورتاسو، شمال غرب زنجان

2019· article· fa· W3112421517 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
آرشام حقیقی بردینه, قاسم نباتیان, حسین کوهستانی, امیرمرتضی عظیم زاده, افشین زهدی

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefa
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction According to Hitzman et al. (2005) and Hayes et al. (2015), the sediment-hosted copper deposits (SHC) are stratiform disseminated to veinlet copper mineralization within the reduced black shale, sandstone, and carbonate rocks. These deposits have formed during the middle-late Paleoproterozoic (e.g., Udokan, Russia: Volodin et al. 1994, Yinmin, South China: Zhao et al. 2013) to Tertiary (e.g., Corocoro, Bolivia: Flint 1989). The SHC deposits, frequently labeled as “stratiform” or “stratabound” and/or “diagenetic” deposits have been subdivided into three types (Cox 1986, Cox et al. 2003, Hitzman et al. 2005): 1- reduced-facies (RF), 2- Redbed (RB) and 3- Revett (RV). There are several SHC deposits in the Zanjan region hosted by the Upper Red Formation. The Chehrabad, Cherlangoush, Ghezeljeh, Halab, Ortasou and Sarikand deposits are the most important ones and are well-developed in this district. These deposits consist predominantly of bedding-parallel replacement and disseminated Cu-Pb-Zn sulfides, roughly concordant with stratification. The average Cu and Pb values of these deposits are ~3 and 2 wt.%, respectively. These deposits are small but they are actively mined at present. The aim of this work is to expand knowledge on the geological framework, mineralization features, geochemistry and genesis of the Ortasu Pb-Zn deposit. The study of the Ortasu deposit can be used as an exploration model for similar deposits in the Zanjan district and other places. Materials and methods Detailed field studies have been done at different scales in the Ortasou area. Polished thin and thin sections from mineralized zones and host rocks were studied by conventional petrographic and mineralogic methods at the University of Zanjan. Furthermore, a total of six samples from mineralized host rocks were analyzed by ICP-MS for major and trace elements and Rare Earth Elements (REE) at Lab West Co., Australia. Results and Discussion The Ortasu Pb-Zn deposit is located in the northwest of Zanjan and Central Iran zone. The outcrop formations in this region involve Lower Red, Qom and Upper Red Formations from which the Upper Red Formation hosts the mineralized zones. In this region, the Upper Red Formation consists of alternation of red to brown and grey to greenish marl associated with interbedded sandstone sequences. Based on petrographic studies, composition of the mineralized host rocks are litharenite which consist of sedimentary, metamorphic and igneous fragments, quartz and feldspar. In the Ortasu Pb-Zn deposit, mineralization has occurred within two horizons of reduced-grey sandstone with about five to six m thickness and about 100 m length. These horizons contain both red oxidized zone and bleached zone with a mineralized reduced subzone which is located within the bleached zone. The red oxidized zone consists of red marl and sandstone layers containing iron oxides which is located adjacent to the reduced horizons. The red color of this zone is caused by the presence of iron oxides around the grains. The oxidized pyrite crystals are the main important minerals in this zone. The bleached zone is part of sandstone sequences whose color has changed by the alteration processes. Grey and green colors in the bleached zone have occurred due to the presence of organic materials and diagenetic pyrites. The mineralization subzone has occurred within the organic materials-bearing bleached zones. Plant debris, plant fossils, diagenetic pyrites and permeability of host rock have the main important role for Pb-Zn mineralization. Galena, sphalerite, pyrite and chalcopyrite are the main important minerals in the Ortasu Pb-Zn deposit in some parts. They have been replaced by secondary minerals such as cerussite, chalcocite, covellite and iron oxides due to the supergene and weathering processes. The most important textures in this deposit are disseminated and cemented textures. It should be mentioned that the laminated-like, framboidal pyrite, replacement and relict textures are also observed in this deposit. The presence of fining-upward sequences is due to the sediment cycles of channels, layered structures, abundant organic materials in paleochannels and debris of plant fossil all of which indicate that the Ortasu Pb-Zn deposit is formed in a continental to tidal environment. Geochemical studies show that the sandstones were deposited in an active continental margin. These sandstones originated from felsic magmatic rock and were deposited in an arid climate condition. According to host rock, geometry, structure and texture, and mineralogy it can be concluded that the Ortasu Pb-Zn deposit has more similarity with the distal parts of Redbed type of sediment-hosted copper deposits. Acknowledgements All logistical supports during field studies came from the University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran. References Cox, D.P., 1986. Descriptive model of sediment-hosted Cu. In: D.P. Cox and D.A. Singer (Editors), Mineral deposit models. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin. Canada, Pp. 101–104. Cox, D.P., Lindsey, D.A., Singer, D.A., Moring, B.C. and Diggles, M.F., 2003. Sediment-hosted copper deposits of the world-deposit models and database. U.S. Geological Survey, Canada, open-file report 03-107, 53 pp. Flint, S.S., 1989. Sediment-hosted stratabound copper deposits of the Central Andes. In: R.W. Boyle, A.C. Brown, C.W. Jefferson, E.C., Jowett and R.V. Kirkham (Editors), Sediment-hosted stratiform copper deposits. Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper, Canada. pp. 371–400. Hayes, T.S., Cox, D.P., Piatak, N.M. and Seal, R.R., 2015. Sediment-hosted stratabound copper deposit model. U.S. Geological Survey, Canada, Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5070-M, 147 pp. Hitzman, M., Kirkham, R., Broughton, D., Thorson, J. and Selley, D., 2005. The sediment-hosted stratiform copper ore system. In: J.W. Hedenquist, J.F.H. Thompson, R.J. Goldfarb and J.P. Richards (Editors), One Hundredth Anniversary volume of Economic Geology. Society of Economic Geologists, Colorado, pp. 609–612. Volodin, R.N., Chechetkin, V.S., Bogdanov, Y.V., Narkelyun, L.F. and Trubachev, A.I., 1994. The Udokan cupriferous sandstones deposit (eastern Siberia). Geology of Ore Deposits, 36(1): 1–25. Zhao, X.F., Zhou, M.F., Li, J.W. and Qi, L., 2013. Late Paleoproterozoic sedimentary rock-hosted stratiform copper deposits in South China: their possible link to the supercontinent cycle. Mineralium Deposita, 48(1): 129–136.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.229
GPT teacher head0.520
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→