MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112434064 · doi:10.17762/de.vi.967

Practice Teaching Reformation of "Four Segments Integration" of Marketing Based on OBE Theory

2020· article· en· W3112434064 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dong Liang Yi Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueDesign Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Marketing Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJianghan University
KeywordsOrder (exchange)CurriculumCompetition (biology)Quality (philosophy)MarketingProcess (computing)SpecialtyThe InternetMarketing managementBusinessEngineering managementEngineeringComputer scienceEconomicsPsychologyEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development of Internet and information technology, the continuous impact of the new epidemic on the global economy, the market environment has put forward new requirements for marketing personnel. This paper systematically analyzes the current demand for marketing talents, scientifically expounds the concept of OBE education mode, and summarizes the experience of the reform of practical teaching system based on the OBE concept for engineering majors at home and abroad. In view of the current situation of talent training of marketing major in Jianghan University, this paper puts forward the reform ideas of " Four segments integration", including deepening experimental curriculum design, strengthening discipline competition, optimizing practice process and strengthening risk management, in order to innovate the teaching mode of marketing specialty and improve the quality of marketing teaching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDesign EngineeringSame topicManagement and Marketing EducationFrench-language works237,207