MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112442729 · doi:10.1002/alz.043395

Evaluation of a retinal deep phenotyping platform to detect the likely cerebral amyloid PET status in humans

2020· article· en· W3112442729 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Paul Soucy, Claudia Chevrefils, Sam Osseiran, Jean‐Philippe Sylvestre, Sylvain Beaulieu, Tharick A. Pascoal, Jean Daniel Arbour, Marc‐André Rhéaume, Sylvia Villeneuve, Ziad Nasreddine, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Serge Gauthier, Alain Robillard, Céline Chayer, Sandra E. Black, Peter J. Kertes, Hossam El Shahawy, John J. Chen, David S. Knopman, Val J. Lowe, Frédéric Lesage

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNorth Toronto Eye CareHealth Sciences CentreDouglas Mental Health University InstituteClinique Paro ExcellenceSunnybrook Health Science CentreOptina Diagnostics (Canada)McGill University Health CentrePolytechnique MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontGreenfield Research (Canada)Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceHyperspectral imagingRetinalGold standard (test)BiomarkerFeature selectionNeuroimagingClassifier (UML)Pattern recognition (psychology)MedicinePositron emission tomographyComputer sciencePathologyNuclear medicineRadiologyOphthalmologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Translating recent advances in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other dementias to clinical practice using biomarker‐based approaches requires accessible, affordable biomarkers. This protocol tested the performance of a Retinal Deep Phenotyping platform for the detection of likely positron‐emission tomography (PET) amyloid status (negative or positive) in human subjects. This platform generates data rich retinal reflectance images captured non‐invasively with a Metabolic Hyperspectral Retinal Camera (MHRC) yielding specific spatial‐spectral features which are analyzed by a machine learning algorithm relatively to a recognized gold standard biomarker (in this case PET amyloid imaging). Methods 134 subjects (50 years and older) from 3 clinical sites were included, 94 with normal, 40 with abnormal cognition, imaged with the MHRC and amyloid PET (unanimous visual reads from a panel of 3 expert reviewers; 42 amyloid positive, 92 negative). Over 600 spatial‐spectral features were extracted from hyperspectral retinal images obtained at 450‐900 nm. After a feature selection based on F‐score ranking, a classifier was trained on the datasets from 87 patients (2/3 of the cohort) using the most discriminating features. The classification performance was then evaluated with the datasets from the remaining 47 patients. Results Resubstituting the training set of 87 patients into the classifier yielded sensitivity and specificity values of 88% and 91%, respectively. The training misclassification rate was predicted using the k ‐fold loss metric, with a predicted error rate of 19%. To verify this performance, the test set of 47 patients was classified by the model resulting in sensitivity and specificity values of 80% and 81%, respectively. Conclusions The Retinal Deep Phenotyping platform shows promise for detecting the likely cerebral amyloid PET status in human subjects and could serve as a screening tool to identify subjects in the AD continuum, for instance in a clinical or drug development context. The platform could also be used for the detection of other biomarkers involved in cognitive decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207