Procedure of Solving 3-SAT Problem by Combining Quantum Search Algorithm and DPLL Algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although some classical algorithms have been applied to solve the satisfiability problem, more effective methods are still explored because existing algorithms are constrained by inadequate computing capability of traditional computers. The parallelism of quantum computation makes quantum algorithms with promising potential to improve the computing ability, but existing quantum algorithms still require too large number of qubits to solve a simple problem effectively. In this paper, an optimized data structure was structured to solve Boolean satisfiability problem by utilizing Grover's algorithm, and then the corresponding formula was proposed to balance variables in consideration of complexity. With reasonable simplification, quantum circuits were built to decrease the number of qubits required in Grover's algorithm. The result of verification experiment further demonstrated that the proposed approach is simple, reliable and of a certain practical value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it