Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les nouvelles ayant précédé les romans dans l'espace feuilleton des journaux parisiens, nous devons rétablir l'antériorité et souligner l'importance essentielle du « feuilleton-nouvelle » dans le système médiatique transnational du premier XIXe siècle, en particulier dans les années 1836-1848. Ces textes courts furent très nombreux à circuler dans la sphère médiatique et à être traduits dans toutes les langues. Le cas de quelques textes écrits par Marie Aycard ayant circulé anonymement dans la presse espagnole servira ici d'exemple d'acculturation de feuilletons-nouvelles étrangers, sans source proclamée, dans une autre aire linguistique où ils connaîtront une vie littéraire autonome et une circulation s'étendant parfois sur un siècle ou davantage, devenant une partie de la culture médiatique du pays d'accueil, après avoir complètement échappé à leur créateur original.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".