MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112503563 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.3043203

Accurate Image-Based Pedestrian Detection With Privacy Preservation

2020· article· en· W3112503563 on OpenAlexaff
Haomiao Yang, Qixian Zhou, Jianbing Ni, Hongwei Li, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEncryptionPedestrian detectionComputer scienceSupport vector machineHistogramPedestrianKernel (algebra)Overhead (engineering)Feature extractionBlock (permutation group theory)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionHomomorphic encryptionPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)MathematicsEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose an accurate pedestrian detection scheme with privacy preservation (PPPD) based on pedestrian images. By utilizing the vector homomorphic encryption (VHE), private linear-transforming matrices are ingeniously designed to enable arbitrary permutation operations for the encrypted vectors. In this way, the feature vector extraction of the histogram of oriented gradient (HOG) can be efficiently performed over the encrypted pedestrian images. Furthermore, due to the encrypted inner product calculations supported by VHE, an encrypted kernel matrix is constructed to generate multiple encrypted kernels (i.e., linear, polynomial, and Gaussian kernels). The pedestrian detection model based on the supported vector machine (SVM) can be securely trained over the encrypted kernels. With the proposed scheme, the extracted features of pedestrian images are not necessary to be returned to the image owner for decryption, such that the communication costs can be significantly reduced. In addition, the privacy of the whole process in pedestrian detection can also be guaranteed. Extensive experiments are conducted over multiple pedestrian datasets, and it is demonstrated that PPPD can achieve high accuracy of pedestrian detection with lower computation and communication overhead compared with the existing schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207