Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian dan penulisan ini membahas hal – hal yang berkaitan dengan Efektivitas Program Perlindungan Anak pada Dinas Pengendalian Penduduk, Keluarga Berencana, Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Kabupaten Subang dilihat dari teori menurut Budiani (2007 : 53) yaitu ketepatan sasaran program, sosialisasi program, tujuan program, dan pemantauan program. Program Perlindungan Anak di Kabupaten Subang dapat dikatakan belum efektif, hal ini dapat dilihat dari indikator teori yang digunakan yaitu indikator sosialisasi program dan tujuan program. Sedangkan indikator ketepatan sasaran program dan pemantauan program sudah berjalan dengan baik. Indikator sosialisasi program sangat penting dilakukan guna penyebaran informasi terkait program perlindungan anak, yang mana sasarannya tidak hanya instansi pemerintah tetapi juga anak khususnya dan masyarakat pada umumnya. Sosialisasi program perlindungan anak ini belum berjalan dengan efektif karena terbatasnya anggaran dan sumber daya manusia. Sedangkan indikator tujuan program belum efektif karena masih kurangnya sosialisasi sehingga masih banyak masyarakat yang tidak mengetahui apa saja tujuan dari program perlindungan anak. This research and writing discusses matters related to the Effectiveness of the Child Protection Program at the Population Control, Family Planning, Women's Empowerment and Child Protection Office in Subang Regency, seen from the theory according to Budiani (2007: 53), namely program targeting accuracy, program socialization, program objectives. , and program monitoring. It can be said that the Child Protection Program in Subang District has not been effective, this can be seen from the theoretical indicators used, namely indicators of program socialization and program objectives. Meanwhile, indicators of program targeting accuracy and program monitoring have been running well. Indicators of program socialization are very important in order to disseminate information related to child protection programs, which target not only government agencies but also children in particular and society in general. The socialization of this child protection program has not been effective due to limited budgets and human resources. Meanwhile, the program objective indicators have not been effective because of the lack of socialization, so that many people do not know what the objectives of child protection programs are.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".