MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112555565 · doi:10.37950/wfaj.v2i2.944

Efektivitas Program Perlindungan Anak Di Kabupaten Subang

2020· article· id· W3112555565 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe World of Financial Administration Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Character Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocializationPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyPsychologySocial scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian dan penulisan ini membahas hal – hal yang berkaitan dengan Efektivitas Program Perlindungan Anak pada Dinas Pengendalian Penduduk, Keluarga Berencana, Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Kabupaten Subang dilihat dari teori menurut Budiani (2007 : 53) yaitu ketepatan sasaran program, sosialisasi program, tujuan program, dan pemantauan program. Program Perlindungan Anak di Kabupaten Subang dapat dikatakan belum efektif, hal ini dapat dilihat dari indikator teori yang digunakan yaitu indikator sosialisasi program dan tujuan program. Sedangkan indikator ketepatan sasaran program dan pemantauan program sudah berjalan dengan baik. Indikator sosialisasi program sangat penting dilakukan guna penyebaran informasi terkait program perlindungan anak, yang mana sasarannya tidak hanya instansi pemerintah tetapi juga anak khususnya dan masyarakat pada umumnya. Sosialisasi program perlindungan anak ini belum berjalan dengan efektif karena terbatasnya anggaran dan sumber daya manusia. Sedangkan indikator tujuan program belum efektif karena masih kurangnya sosialisasi sehingga masih banyak masyarakat yang tidak mengetahui apa saja tujuan dari program perlindungan anak.
 
 This research and writing discusses matters related to the Effectiveness of the Child Protection Program at the Population Control, Family Planning, Women's Empowerment and Child Protection Office in Subang Regency, seen from the theory according to Budiani (2007: 53), namely program targeting accuracy, program socialization, program objectives. , and program monitoring. It can be said that the Child Protection Program in Subang District has not been effective, this can be seen from the theoretical indicators used, namely indicators of program socialization and program objectives. Meanwhile, indicators of program targeting accuracy and program monitoring have been running well. Indicators of program socialization are very important in order to disseminate information related to child protection programs, which target not only government agencies but also children in particular and society in general. The socialization of this child protection program has not been effective due to limited budgets and human resources. Meanwhile, the program objective indicators have not been effective because of the lack of socialization, so that many people do not know what the objectives of child protection programs are.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it