On ideal $ t $-tuple distribution of orthogonal functions in filtering de bruijn generators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p style='text-indent:20px;'>Uniformity in binary tuples of various lengths in a pseudorandom sequence is an important randomness property. We consider ideal <inline-formula><tex-math id="M1">\begin{document}$ t $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>-tuple distribution of a filtering de Bruijn generator consisting of a de Bruijn sequence of period <inline-formula><tex-math id="M2">\begin{document}$ 2^n $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> and a filtering function in <inline-formula><tex-math id="M3">\begin{document}$ m $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> variables. We restrict ourselves to the family of orthogonal functions, that correspond to binary sequences with ideal 2-level autocorrelation, used as filtering functions. After the twenty years of discovery of Welch-Gong (WG) transformations, there are no much significant results on randomness of WG transformation sequences. In this article, we present new results on uniformity of the WG transform of orthogonal functions on de Bruijn sequences. First, we introduce a new property, called <i>invariant under the WG transform</i>, of Boolean functions. We have found that there are only two classes of orthogonal functions whose WG transformations preserve <inline-formula><tex-math id="M4">\begin{document}$ t $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>-tuple uniformity in output sequences, up to <inline-formula><tex-math id="M5">\begin{document}$ t = (n-m+1) $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>. The conjecture of Mandal <i>et al.</i> in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b29">29</xref>] about the ideal tuple distribution on the WG transformation is proved. It is also shown that the Gold functions and quadratic functions can guarantee <inline-formula><tex-math id="M6">\begin{document}$ (n-m+1) $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>-tuple distributions. A connection between the ideal tuple distribution and the invariance under WG transform property is established.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it