MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112567041 · doi:10.1021/acsaem.0c02474

Effect of Postannealing on the Properties of a Ta-Doped Li<sub>7</sub>La<sub>3</sub>Zr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>12</sub> Solid Electrolyte Degraded by Li Dendrite Penetration

2020· article· en· W3112567041 on OpenAlexaff
Ryoji Inada, Atsuto Takeda, Yusuke Yamazaki, Shotaro Miyake, Yoji Sakurai, Venkataraman Thangadurai

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Energy Materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsMaterials scienceElectrolyteElectrochemistryAnnealing (glass)ConductivityDopingDendrite (mathematics)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Composite materialMineralogyMetallurgyChemical engineeringElectrodeChemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we investigated the effect of postannealing on the properties of a garnet-type Ta-doped Li 6.55 La 3 Zr 1.55 Ta 0.45 O 12 (Ta-LLZO) ceramic solid electrolyte degraded by lithium (Li) dendrite penetration during electrochemical Li plating and stripping testing in a Li/Ta-LLZO/Li symmetric cell. After the electrochemical testing in the symmetric cell, the Ta-LLZO pellet was taken out of the cell and then annealed at 800 or 900 °C for 4 h in air. It was confirmed that locally discolored spots on the Ta-LLZO surface at which Li dendrite penetrated disappeared after postannealing. The total conductivity of the annealed Ta-LLZO pellet was lower than the initial one but was retained above 10 –4 S cm –1 at room temperature. When the soft-shorted or degraded area size by Li dendrite penetration is localized and smaller than the area size for Ta-LLZO, it is expected that the degradation of the conductivity of annealed Ta-LLZO becomes smaller. Obtained electrochemical results indicate the possibility of reusing the degraded garnet-type solid electrolyte by Li dendrite penetration in another all-solid-state Li battery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Energy MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207