MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112569686 · doi:10.1080/19186444.2020.1855957

Oil price, exchange rate and stock market performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for TNCs and FDI inflow in Nigeria

2020· article· en· W3112569686 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Philip Ifeakachukwu Nwosa

Bibliographic record

VenueTransnational Corporation Review · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExchange rateStock marketMonetary economicsEconomicsGranger causalityPandemicForeign direct investmentStock exchangeRecessionOil priceStock (firearms)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)BusinessInternational economicsMacroeconomicsFinanceEconometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study evaluates the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on oil price, exchange rate and stock market performance, and the implications for Transnational Corporations (TNCs) and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflow in Nigeria. The study used daily data over the period 1 Decebber 2019 to 31 May 2020. The study employed descriptive and causality techniques. The study observed that COVID-19 had adverse effects on oil price, exchange rate and stock market performance in Nigeria. Also, the study observed that COVID-19 had more impact on oil price, exchange rate and stock market performance than the 2009 and 2016 global recessions. The causality estimate showed that oil price had significant influence on exchange rate and stock market performance while exchange rate significantly influenced stock market performance. The study concluded that impact of COVID-19 pandemic on oil price, exchange rate and stock market performance had implications for TNCs and FDI inflow in Nigeria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransnational Corporation ReviewSame topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207