MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, muscle relaxants, and B-group vitamins in the treatment of lumbar ischialgia

2020· article· en· W3112617072 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V.A. Shirokov, A.V. Potaturko, Никита Л. Терехов

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology neuropsychiatry Psychosomatics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeloxicamMedicineVisual analogue scaleAnesthesiaLumbarNonsteroidalGroup BSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and muscle relaxants are used orally or intramuscularly (IM) to treat lumbar ischialgia caused by musculoskeletal disorders or radiculopathy. A comparative study has been conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of the NSAID meloxicam (Amelotex®) injected intramuscularly and into the trigger points in combination with tolperisone and B-group vitamins for lumbar ischialgia. Patients and methods . The investigation enrolled 62 patients aged 30–60 years with lumbar ischialgia, who were randomized into three equal groups. Group 1 patients were injected with meloxicam 1.5 ml (15 mg of its active ingredient) into the trigger points daily for 3 days, followed by one 15-mg tablet daily for 14 days; Group 2 received IM meloxicam 15 mg daily for 3 days, followed by one 15-mg tablet daily for 14 days; Group 3 had IM meloxicam 15 mg daily for 3 days, followed by one 15-mg tablet daily for 14 days in combination with tolperisone (Calmirex®) as tablets: 150 mg (Day 1 of therapy), 300 mg (Day 2), and 450 mg daily (Day 3 until the end of therapy). All the patients received IM Vitamin B complex (Compligam B®) 2 ml for 5 days. The treatment efficiency was evaluated using the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), the Oswestry disability questionnaire, and the McGill pain questionnaire, the range of motion, and the severity of neurodystrophic syndrome. Results and discussion . All the patient groups showed a rapid and substantial pain reduction on the VAS and a functional activity improvement according to the Oswestry scale, which made it possible to complete the treatment within an average of 9.6 days. Groups 3 and 1 exhibited a faster improvement and, as a result, a shorter therapy duration on 8.6±1.2 and 9.2±0.9 days than did Group 2 (8.6±1.2 days). On day 2 of treatment, there was a more considerable pain reduction on the VAS in Group 1 that received meloxicam injections into the trigger zones. The administration of meloxicam intramuscularly and into the trigger zones in combination with tolperisone and vitamin B complex was noted to be safe and well tolerated. Conclusion . The injection of Amelotex into the trigger zones is highly effective and safe in treating lumbar ischialgia. An NSAID (meloxicam) in combination with a muscle relaxant (tolperisone) speeds up recovery and shortens the duration of NSAID intake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology neuropsychiatry PsychosomaticsSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207