MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112619798

Numerical Modeling of the Formation of Shackleton Crater at the Lunar South Pole

2020· article· en· W3112619798 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel Halim, Natasha Barrett, Sarah Boazman, Aleksandra Gawronska, Cosette Gilmour, Harish, K. McCanaan, A.V. Satyakumar, Jahnavi Shah, D. A. Kring

Bibliographic record

VenueLunar and Planetary Science Conference · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpact craterGeologyEjectaAsteroidLunar cratersAstrobiologyGeomorphologyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The lunar south pole, on the rim of Shackleton crater, is the target for the next human landing on the Moon. We use numerical modeling to investigate the formation of that crater and the distribution of ejecta around the south pole. We find that a 1.5 km diameter asteroid with a chondrite-like composition, vertically impacting a gabbroic anorthositic target at 15 km/s, forms a crater morphologically similar to Shackleton. If the impact had a shallower 45-degree trajectory, the asteroid may have had a diameter of 1.75 km and velocity of 15 km/s or a diameter of 1.5 km and velocity of 20 km/s. Impact melt is generated during the impact, with most of the melt volume ponding on the crater floor. We introduce a water-bearing layer at various depths in the target and find that the burial depth of a volatile layer influences the final crater morphology and may explain the morphology of Shackleton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLunar and Planetary Science ConferenceSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207