MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112642073

Functionalized Metal-Organic Frameworks for Water Oxidation Catalysis

2019· dissertation· en· W3112642073 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shaoyang Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueVTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of ScienceUniversity of WashingtonCanadian Light SourceArgonne National LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsMetal-organic frameworkCatalysisChemistryEnvironmental chemistryOrganic chemistryAdsorption
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasing energy demand will not only aggravate global warming, but also cause fossil fuels shortage in the near future. Solar energy is an infinite green energy resource that can potentially satisfy our energy usage. By utilizing solar energy to drive reactions like water splitting, solar fuels system are able to produce valuable energy resource. Catalysts for water oxidation are the essential component of water splitting cells which have been intensively studied. As a solid state porous crystalline material with synthetic tunability, Metal-organic framework (MOF) is a promising platform for water oxidation catalysis due to its outstanding properties. Herein, we aimed to develop molecular catalysts incorporated MOF for water oxidation and study the reaction mechanism. Chapter 1 introduces the background of water oxidation and previous research on ruthenium nuclear water oxidation catalysts (WOCs). The reaction mechanism of binuclear and mononuclear ruthenium WOCs was briefly summarized. Opportunities for the design and the synthesis of MOF based WOCs were then discussed. Lastly, studies about MOF based WOCs were categorized based on the difference of the WOCs active site location in frameworks. Water oxidation catalyst [Ru(dcbpy)(tpy)OH2]2+ (RuTB) was incorporated into UiO-67 MOF (resulting materials denoted as RuTB-UiO-67) for chemical water oxidation in Chapter 2. Differences of catalytic reaction behavior between homogeneous RuTB and RuTB incorporated in MOF were examined. Based on MOF particle size dependent catalysis reaction experiments, in-MOF reactivity was anticipated to be primarily arose from redox hopping between RuTB active sites in the framework. In Chapter 3, RuTB-UiO-67 MOF thin films grown on conducting FTO substrate (RuTB-UiO-67/FTO) were synthesized to test their catalytic activity of electrochemical water oxidation. Electrochemical behavior of RuTB-UiO-67/FTO was found to be consistent with homogeneous RuTB by various electrochemistry study and in-situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy characterization. Scan-rate-dependent voltammetry study demonstrated the homogeneous distribution of electrochemical active sites throughout the MOF thin film. Diffusion controlled redox hopping was attributed to be the main charge transfer pathway during catalysis. In order to pursue photo-induced water splitting system, we further our study by investigating MOF based photoelectrochemical catalysis in Chapter 4. Photoelectrochemical alcohol oxidation was chosen as the preliminary-stage study towards the more challenging goal, photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Electron transfer processes of the photosensitizer ([Ru(bpy)2(dcbpy)]2+) and the catalyst (RuTB) doped UiO-67 MOF were investigated with transient absorption spectroscopy analysis. Finally, the role of redox hopping in electrocatalysis by MOF was reviewed in Chapter 5. Pathways of charge transfer in electroactive MOF were first summarized. Redox hopping in MOF was then compared with previous studies on redox active polymer thin films. Lastly, factors that will affect the rate of redox hopping of MOF electrocatalyst were discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVTechWorks (Virginia Tech)Same topicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207