ГЕОМОРФОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ТРУДЫ ВЫДАЮЩЕГОСЯ ЕВРОПЕЙСКОГО УЧЕНОГО АЛЬБРЕХТА ПЕНКА (1858–1945)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The vast geomorphological heritage of the outstanding German scientist Albrecht Penck mainly related to general geomorphology, the geomorphology of mountains, climatology, hydrology and hypsometric maps, has so far been insufficiently known by Soviet/Russian geomorphologists. His fundamental studies are related to the last twenty years of the 19 th and the first quarter of the 20 th century. He was engaged in fieldwork in Europe–mainly in the Alps and the Danube basin, the mountains of Spain, North Morocco, and also in Canada, Australia, China, Japan and some other countries, and created the first classification of climates. Together with Eduard Bruckner, he was co-author of a concept of ancient glaciation; they were the first to identify the four ice ages of the European Pleistocene (Gunz, Mindel, Riss, Wurm). Albrecht Penck enriched geomorphology with the concept of “summit level of denudation”. He was convinced that the heights of the snow- and forest-line were responsible for mountain heights, the rate of denudation and therefore, determine the height of the summit level of denudation ( gipfelflur ) for each climate. Later, he moved away from these ideas and introduced the term “summit surface” poining to the constant eleveation of the summit levels without explaining the phenomenon per se. Academician Konstantin Markov spoke of Albrecht Penck as one of the prominent geomorphologists with rich scientific heritage and as “Nestor the Chronicler of foreign geomorphology”. For a long time Penck was a Director of the Institute and Museum of Oceanography in Berlin and a member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. He was well-known in the academic circles of Russia, some of his works were published in Russian; he regularly visited Russia and was elected honorary member of the Moscow Society of Naturalists, Russia’s oldest society of nature explorers set up in 1805. In 1859, von Humboldt-Ritter Stiftung (the Humboldt-Ritter Foundation) was set up in Germany and actively functioned after their deaths. After Pencks death died in 1945 the foundation was transformed to Humboldt-Ritter-Penck Foundation, and has been active up to now days.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".