MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112675244 · doi:10.1145/3447556.3447563

A Report on the First Workshop on Document Intelligence (DI) at NeurIPS 2019

2021· article· en· W3112675244 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hamid Motahari, Nigel Duffy, Paul N. Bennett, Tania Bedrax-Weiss

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Data Mining and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLibrary scienceIntelligence analysisData scienceWorld Wide WebComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first workshop on Document Intelligence (DI-2019) was held on December 14, 2019 at NeurIPS 2019 conference in Vancouver, Canada. The report summarizes the workshop, with a summary of the talks, papers and posters presented, and discusses common themes, issues and open questions that came up in the workshop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0130.008
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1060.086

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGKDD Explorations NewsletterSame topicWeb Data Mining and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207