Swarm Observations of Dawn/Dusk Asymmetries Between Pedersen Conductance in Upward and Downward Field‐Aligned Current Regions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The locations of region 1 and 2 field‐aligned current systems were determined using fluxgate magnetometer measurements from 875 dawn‐dusk passes of the Swarm A satellite. Within each field‐aligned current region, the ionospheric Pedersen conductance was derived from the newly corrected Swarm electric and magnetic field measurements. The Pedersen conductances are generally consistent with photoionization models. However, we show that the in situ method of determining Pedersen conductance allows for a more complete description of magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling and should be used in future studies when possible. We show that, overall, the Pedersen conductance is larger in the upward current region than in the downward region by ∼0.6 S on the dawn side of the Earth. Meanwhile, the dusk side Pedersen conductance is equivalent in both current regions. We attribute this asymmetry to dawn side energetic electron precipitation, commonly associated with substorm electron injections from the magnetotail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".