Delayed Processing of Secretin-Induced Pancreas Fluid Influences the Quality and Integrity of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic pancreatic function tests are used to diagnose pancreatic diseases and are a viable source for the discovery of biomarkers to better characterize pancreatic disorders. However, pancreatic fluid (PF) contains active enzymes that degrade biomolecules. Therefore, we tested how preservation methods and time to storage influence the integrity and quality of proteins and nucleic acids. METHODS: We obtained PF from 9 subjects who underwent an endoscopic pancreatic function test. Samples were snap frozen at the time of collection; after 1, 2, and 4 hours on ice; or after storage overnight at 4°C with or without RNase or protease inhibitors (PIs). Electrophoresis and mass spectrometry analysis determined protein abundance and quality, whereas nucleic acid integrity values determined DNA and RNA degradation. RESULTS: Protein degradation increased after 4 hours on ice and DNA degradation after 2 hours on ice. Adding PIs delayed degradation. RNA was significantly degraded under all conditions compared with the snap frozen samples. Isolated RNA from PF-derived exosomes exhibited similar poor quality as RNA isolated from matched PF samples. CONCLUSIONS: Adding PIs immediately after collecting PF and processing the fluid within 4 hours of collection maintains the protein and nucleic acid integrity for use in downstream molecular analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".