The Arctic Ocean Melt and the Impacts in Traditional Populations: Possibilities for an International Guarantee
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research intends to show how the melting of the Arctic Ocean, caused by the climatic collapse, affects the life of the traditional populations that inhabit the region and its ways of being influenced by the changes of the landscape and of the own structure and environmental availability. In view of this, it aims to present the environmental balance as a Human Right and, in view of this position, demonstrate the need for international mobilization to protect traditional communities that are historically more vulnerable. In order to do so, the study questions the possibility of universal jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, since the litigation previously raised by the Inuit people was frustrated due to the unavailability of the non-jurisdictional countries. In addition, the possibility of litigation is also raised in the International Criminal Court, on the grounds of Ecocide. Thus, through the hypothetical-deductive method and the questions raised by Cloutier SW, et al. [1], the impacts of climate collapse on vulnerable populations will be demonstrated, with a dissertation on the imperative need of effective and sensitive international tutelage - which also justifies the research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".