A Fully-Connected Neural Network Derived from an Electron Microscopy Map of Olfactory Neurons in Drosophila Melanogaster for Odor Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fruit fly (Drosophila Melanogaster) is well-studied; the organism has served scientists for decades in all manner of biological research - most notably, perhaps, in genetics. However, much of the neuronal "middleware" of the fruit fly is unknown: for instance, how its neural architecture gives rise to functionalities such as odor categorization. Moreover, there is potential for the fruit fly neural network (FFNN) architecture in modelling Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) - the former having been "crafted" over time by generations of evolutionary adaptation. In this work we hope to gain some insight with regards to both problem domains: firstly, with regards to understanding the "middleware" of the fruit fly neural network; secondly, with regards to constructing FFNN-derived ANNs. In particular, we recognize that there is a new opportunity to explore these problem domains in light of recent work on the EM (Electron Microscopy) "hemibrain" - the most comprehensive (to date) EM-derived digital reconstruction of the fruit fly brain, comprising 25,000 neurons (with labels for all neurons and synapses) [1]. Using the hemibrain, we look to the fruit fly olfactory system for the purposes of both exploring its neural architecture and creating an odor classifier. Our FFNN-derived ANN is - at present - fully-connected and uses the 800 most prevalent neurons in the fruit fly olfactory circuit (Antenna Lobe, Mushroom Body Calyx, and Lateral Horn [2]); it also has weight values assigned based on the number of synapses between neurons (an assumption made by the hemibrain authors [1]). Our initial dataset for odor classification includes 33 samples; each with 16 input components (individual resistance values from an array of 16 metal oxide sensors) and 4 output classes (air, ethanol, acetone, or mixed). We augment the dataset to size 33,033 with input noise based on a Gaussian normal distribution. Our current prototype yields greater-than-random test accuracy (37.5%) with 100 epochs of training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".