MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112800830 · doi:10.3138/tric.41.2.a01

The Aesthetics of <i>Towards Youth</i>: Making Relations in and through Theatre

2020· article· fr· W3112800830 on OpenAlex
Kathleen Gallagher, Andrew Kushnir

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Research in Canada · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaInstitute for Christian StudiesUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article de Kathleen Gallagher et Andrew Kushnir présente une étude ethnographique effectuée de 2014 à 2019 auprès de 250 élèves dans des salles d’art dramatique au Canada, en Angleterre, en Inde, en Grèce et à Taïwan. L’expérience et les résultats de la recherche ont servi de base à la pièce Towards Youth, un projet de théâtre documentaire coproduit par les compagnies torontoises Project: Humanity et Crow’s Theatre en février 2019. Cet article fait état du lien qui s’est construit entre la chercheuse en chef et le dramaturge ayant participé au projet. Ces derniers font état de leur vision commune de l’œuvre, de leurs principes esthétiques et éthiques en ce qui a trait à la recherche et à la dramaturgie, ainsi que des efforts qu’ils ont déployés pour tenter de comprendre comment leur auditoire a reçu la pièce documentaire et les pédagogies qui y étaient associées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it