MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3112833364 · doi:10.1002/alz.044905

Mild behavioral impairment associates with Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers and greater risk of incident dementia in patients with MCI

2020· article· en· W3112833364 on OpenAlexaff
Zahinoor Ismail, Sascha Gill, Meng Wang, James Naude, Eric E. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaNeuroimagingMedicineProportional hazards modelCognitive impairmentInternal medicineDiseaseCognitive declineCognitionAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMemory impairmentAlzheimer's diseaseOncologyClinical psychologyPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) is characterized by later life onset of sustained neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) as an at‐risk state for incident cognitive decline and dementia. Here we assess differences in sustained NPS versus transient NPS versus no NPS, on neuroimaging markers and cognitive scores, and the risk of progression to dementia. Method Data from 764 individuals with MCI from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) were analyzed. NPI‐Q items were transformed to MBI domains using a published algorithm. MBI requires sustained NPS for 6 months, thus we grouped individuals based on two visits 6‐months apart as sustained (present at both visits, n=258), transient (present at one visit, n=346), and no NPS (present at neither visit, n=160). For the cross‐sectional analyses, outcomes of interest were matched to the clinical visits assessing NPS. We investigated differences in brain metabolic activity by [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)‐PET, and composite scores of executive functioning and memory in these groups using multiple linear regression adjusted for age, sex and education. Time‐varying cox regression models were constructed, adjusting for age, sex, and education to assess if time to dementia is associated with MBI. Result In these participants with MCI, compared to individuals with no NPS, sustained NPS was associated with reduced [18F] FDG uptake [Adjusted‐=‐0.06 (SE=0.02); p value=0.003], lower executive functioning scores [Adjusted‐=‐0.28 (SE=0.08); p value=0.001], and memory impairment [Adjusted‐=‐0.38 (SE=0.08); p value=<.001]. Compared to individuals with transient NPS, sustained NPS was also associated with reduced glucose metabolism [Adjusted‐=‐0.03 (SE=0.01); p value=0.018], and lower memory scores [Adjusted‐=‐0.17 (SE=0.06); p value=0.007], but not executive functioning. Compared to no or transient NPS, the risk for incident dementia was highest in the sustained NPS group (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.34). Conclusion In a cohort of individuals with MCI, baseline NPS are associated with biomarkers of dementia risk and predict progression to dementia. MBI, as operationalized here by sustained NPS, was associated with worse memory, lower glucose metabolism, and higher risk of incident dementia compared to transient NPS. There is diagnostic and prognostic utility in determining if NPS are sustained or transient, further validating the MBI construct.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→