MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112834674 · doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.153

Islamic Dialogue, Local Culture, and Women in Sigi Regency, Indonesia

2020· article· en· W3112834674 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nuraedah Nuraedah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Criminology and Sociology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural and Religious Practices in Indonesia
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Tadulako
KeywordsIslamBoarding schoolSociologyIslamic cultureLocal communityObject (grammar)Gender studiesPolitical scienceLawTheologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research describes the tradition, Islam, women, and local culture in Sigi Regency through the sociological and historical approach. Tradition, Islam, local culture, and women were objects, and subjects were investigated to describe daily lives around the Islamic Boarding School (Pesantren). Women were the object of the study because they are more sensitive and vulnerable to the development of local traditions. Women's daily activities showed resistance against the domination of men over women. The reality in the society of the district of Sigi showed that women have a substantial contribution as a mediator who served as a liaison, and communicator between Islamic boarding School (pesantren) 's interest' and community's interests. It is most apparent when women contribute to religious activities that were carried out by Islamic Boarding School (Pesantren) and the community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Criminology and SociologySame topicCultural and Religious Practices in IndonesiaFrench-language works237,207