MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112847657 · doi:10.1111/jbi.14052

Abundance and biogeography of methanogenic and methanotrophic microorganisms across European streams

2020· article· en· W3112847657 on OpenAlexaff
Magdalena Nagler, Nadine Praeg, Georg H. Niedrist, Katrin Attermeyer, Núria Catalán, Francesca Pilotto, Catherine Gutmann Roberts, Christoph Bors, Stefano Fenoglio, Miriam Colls, Sophie Cauvy‐Fraunié, Brian C. Doyle, Ferran Romero, Björn Machalett, Thomas Fuß, Adam Bednařík, Marcus Klaus, Peter Gilbert, Dominique Lamonica, Anna Nydahl, Clara Romero González‐Quijano, Lukas Thuile Bistarelli, Lyubomir Kenderov, Elena Piano, Jordi‐René Mor, Vesela Evtimova, Elvira de Eyto, Anna Freixa, Martin Rulı́k, Josephine Pegg, Sonia Herrero Ortega, Lea Steinle, Pascal Bodmer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biogeography · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsArchaeaEcologyAbundance (ecology)MicroorganismSTREAMSSedimentAnaerobic oxidation of methaneEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceMicrobial population biologyMethaneMethanogenesisBiologyBacteriaChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim Although running waters are getting recognized as important methane sources, large‐scale geographical patterns of microorganisms controlling the net methane balance of streams are still unknown. Here we aim at describing community compositions of methanogenic and methanotrophic microorganisms at large spatial scales and at linking their abundances to potential sediment methane production (PMP) and oxidation rates (PMO). Location The study spans across 16 European streams from northern Spain to northern Sweden and from western Ireland to western Bulgaria. Taxon Methanogenic archaea and methane‐oxidizing microorganisms. Methods To provide a geographical overview of both groups in a single approach, microbial communities and abundances were investigated via 16S rRNA gene sequencing, extracting relevant OTUs based on literature; both groups were quantified via quantitative PCR targeting mcrA and pmoA genes and studied in relation to environmental parameters, sediment PMP and PMO, and land use. Results Diversity of methanogenic archaea was higher in warmer streams and of methanotrophic communities in southern sampling sites and in larger streams. Anthropogenically altered, warm and oxygen‐poor streams were dominated by the highly efficient methanogenic families Methanospirillaceae , Methanosarcinaceae and Methanobacteriaceae , but did not harbour any specific methanotrophic organisms. Contrastingly, sediment communities in colder, oxygen‐rich waters with little anthropogenic impact were characterized by methanogenic Methanosaetaceae , Methanocellaceae and Methanoflorentaceae and methanotrophic Methylococcaceae and Cd . Methanoperedens. Representatives of the methanotrophic Crenotrichaceae and Methylococcaceae as well as the methanogenic Methanoregulaceae were characteristic for environments with larger catchment area and higher discharge. PMP increased with increasing abundance of methanogenic archaea, while PMO rates did not show correlations with abundances of methane‐oxidizing bacteria. Main conclusions Methanogenic and methanotrophic communities grouping into three habitat types suggest that future climate‐ and land use changes may influence the prevailing microbes involved in the large‐scale stream‐related methane cycle, favouring the growth of highly efficient hydrogenotrophic methane producers. Based on these results, we expect global change effect on PMP rates to especially impact rivers adjacent to anthropogenically disturbed land uses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BiogeographySame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207