MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112852656 · doi:10.3828/cfc.2020.20

<i>College Boy</i> (2013) de Xavier Dolan: pérenniser “le backward feeling”

2020· article· en· W3112852656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary French Civilization · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingHumanitiesArtPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2013, Xavier Dolan, cinéaste, acteur et metteur en scène québécois prolifique, réalise le vidéoclip College Boy, chanson du groupe de musique français Indochine qui s’articule autour d’un jeune garçon queer qui est victime d’homophobie dans un internat. Cet article propose une analyse de ce vidéoclip en se focalisant sur la mise en scène de la violence et des affects négatifs. Nous étudions d’abord le débat provoqué par la diffusion et la censure du clip en France. Ensuite, à partir de la théorie du “backward feeling” développée par Heather Love dans Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History (2007), nous analysons la manière dont la représentation de la violence dans l’œuvre de Dolan remet en question l’ordre hétéronormatif. Nous défendons la thèse qu’en s’attaquant de front aux institutions qui sont les véritables agents de la violence homophobe, College Boy contribue à la conservation archivistique de l’expérience queer et crée ainsi une possibilité d’émancipation face à l’hétéronormativité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it