MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112904950 · doi:10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283472

Detecting Internet Worms, Ransomware, and Blackouts Using Recurrent Neural Networks

2020· article· en· W3112904950 on OpenAlexaff
Zhida Li, Ana Laura Gonzalez Rios, Ljiljana Trajković

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBorder Gateway ProtocolRansomwareComputer scienceReachabilityAnomaly detectionThe InternetComputer networkComputer securityBlackoutArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceData miningRouting protocolRouting (electronic design automation)MalwareWorld Wide WebTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analyzing and detecting Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) anomalies are topics of great interest in cybersecurity. Various anomaly detection approaches such as time series and historical-based analysis, statistical validation, reachability checks, and machine learning have been applied to BGP datasets. In this paper, we use BGP update messages collected from Réseaux IP Europeens and Route Views to detect BGP anomalies caused by Slammer worm, WannaCrypt ransomware, and Moscow blackout by employing recurrent neural network machine learning algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207