MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112941089 · doi:10.31857/s268667300012343-7

The Chinese Aspect of the U.S.-EU Trade and Economic Contradictions

2020· article· en· W3112941089 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Menshikova

Bibliographic record

VenueUSA & Canada Economics – Politics – Culture · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Political and Economic Relations
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Christian Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtectionismInternational tradeEconomic sanctionsChinaRivalryAdministration (probate law)PretextDominance (genetics)Political scienceForeign policyCommercial policyEconomicsDevelopment economicsSanctionsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The protectionist course of foreign policy of the Republican administration D. Trump, has received in recent years a very acute form of trade-economic rivalry of the United States with China, the introduction of Washington's new sanctions and protective customs barriers in foreign trade with a significant number of countries, including the countries-allies in NATO, has as its natural consequence of the massive contradictions between the United States and the European Union. In conditions of permanent escalating "trade war" with China, the EU finds itself in the position of a third party, which very adversely affected by the imposition of extremely complex of adverse factors, exacerbated by the pandemic coronavirus and the resulting global crisis of the world economy. D. Trump consistently implemented in the foreign economic sphere the policy of tough economic dominance in all fields under the pretext of protecting the national security of the United States, based on the stated priority of his administration "America First".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.013
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUSA & Canada Economics – Politics – CultureSame topicGlobal Political and Economic RelationsFrench-language works237,207