MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112942256 · doi:10.1177/2054358120977386

Association of Hyperuricemia With Acute Kidney Injury: Case Series Report Among Patients Hospitalized With General Tonic-Clonic Seizures

2020· article· en· W3112942256 on OpenAlexaff
Jean Côté, Arline-Aude Bérubé, Guillaume Bollée

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMethemoglobinemia and Tumor Lysis Syndrome
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyperuricemiaCreatinineUric acidInterquartile rangeAcute kidney injuryInternal medicineNephropathyKidney diseaseContext (archaeology)GastroenterologyEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Urate nephropathy is a rare cause of acute kidney injury. Although most risk factors are associated with chemotherapy, tumor lysis syndrome or rhabdomyolysis, occurrence following severe seizure has also been reported. Uric acid measurement following convulsion is rarely performed and, therefore, the incidence of hyperuricemia in this context is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to present a case of urate nephropathy following generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) and to investigate the kinetics of serum uric acid and creatinine levels in a series of patients admitted for severe seizures. DESIGN: Retrospective case report and prospective case series. SETTING: Emergency room department and neurology unit of a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: The study included 13 hospitalized patients for severe GTCS. MEASUREMENTS: Type, timing, and duration of seizure episodes were documented. Demographic data, weight, hypouricemic therapy, and baseline serum creatinine were recorded. Blood samples (uric acid, creatinine, blood gas, lactate, and creatinine kinase) and urine samples (uric acid, creatinine, and dipstick) were prospectively collected at Day 0, 1, 2, and 3 following the GTCS episode. METHODS: We identified and described one rare case of urate nephropathy following GTCS. Then, we presented the kinetic of uric acid and creatinine levels and the acute kidney injury incidence over the follow-up period. All analyses were using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: During the study period, 13 patients with a median tonic-clonic seizure duration of 5.0 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 2.0-12.5) were included. From day 0 to day 3, the median serum uric acid level decreased from 346.0 µmol/L (IQR, 155.0-377.5) to 178.0 µmol/L (IQR, 140.0-297.5) and median serum creatinine from 73.0 µmol/L (IQR, 51.0-80.0) to 57.0 µmol/L (IQR, 44.0-70.0). Acute kidney injury occurred in four patients. LIMITATIONS: This is a single-center observational study with small sample size, which does not allow us to demonstrate causality between the increase of uric acid levels observed and the occurrence of acute kidney injury. A delay between the first sampling and seizure episodes was observed and could explain the limited increase of uric acid levels captured. CONCLUSIONS: There is a signal for an acute increase of uric acid levels following a severe seizure before returning to baseline within 3 days. During that period, there might be an increased risk of acute kidney injury, although these changes seem to be usually mild and reversible. Our findings suggest that routine serum uric acid measurement in patients presenting with GTCS could help to identify those patients at risk of developing acute kidney injury as a result of acute hyperuricemia. Further larger studies are required to confirm the effectiveness of such screening in acute kidney injury prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: As an observational noninterventional study, no registration was required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and DiseaseSame topicMethemoglobinemia and Tumor Lysis SyndromeFrench-language works237,207