Apport Des Négro-Africains Au Développement De La Géomancie Et De La Mathématique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les impressions et les interprétations d'artefacts archéologiques dépendent en grande partie de l'expérience personnelle. Elles ne font appel à aucune autorité dogmatique, car elles adhèrent étroitement à la vérité recherchée par les scientifiques qui veulent expliquer les paléo environnements en fonction de l’expérience des données recueillies. Dans le cas présent, l'analyse des données et les conclusions ont permis de confectionner ce que l'on pourrait, par exemple, appeler le discours des os d'Ishango. L'objectif de ce travail est d'améliorer la compréhension du petit os d'Ishango en confrontant le déchiffrement de ses caractéristiques et une feuille de ponctuation d'un thème géomantique. La méthode géomantique qui consiste à faire une série de petites lignes verticales a alors été appliquée à la lecture et à l'analyse du symbolisme du petit os d’Ishango. La lecture visuelle de la morphologie structurale du petit os d'Ishango a été réalisée en utilisant le corpus ésotérique des connaissances de la religion universelle transmises dans le secret initiatique depuis la nuit des temps. Les analogies confirment un lien fort entre les connaissances occultes, la géomancie et les mathématiques dans la conception des os d'Ishango qui a eu lieu aux confins des Grands lacs africains il y a au moins 25 ka. Impressions and interpretations of archeological artefacts are drawn largely from people’s personal experience not appealing to any dogmatic authority, but because they closely adhere to the truth, adamantly hunted by scientists who want to explain paleo environments based on gathered evidence. Analysis of evidence, and findings worked out a set of assumptions what might for instance, be called the discourse of the Ishango bones. The objective of this paper is to improve the understanding of smaller Ishango bone by confronting the deciphering of its strokes and a punctuation sheet of a geomantic theme. Geomantic method of making a series of strokes is applied to the analysis of the symbolism of smaller Ishango bone. Consequently, a visual reading of the structural morphology of smaller Ishango bone was used based on esoteric corpus of knowledge related to the universal religion of the ancient and prehistoric world. Analogies confirm a strong tie between occult knowledge, geomancy and mathematics in the designing of the Ishango bones that took place on the edge of African Great Lakes at least 25 ka ago.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".