Detection of Head Raising Rate of Students in Classroom Based on Head Posture Recognition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proliferation of smart mobile terminals has weakened the attention and reduced the learning efficiency of students, making them more likely to lower their heads. To quantify the classroom participation, it is helpful to detect the head raising rate (HRR) of students in classroom. To this end, this paper puts forward a novel method to recognize the HRR of students in classroom. Based on the map of predicted facial features, an extraction method was developed for the salient facial features of students, and used to realize model matching between facial contour and facial organ. Next, the face orientation of each student was determined by soft label coding. After that, a multi-task convolutional neural network (CNN) was constructed to detect the HRR of students. The authors also explained the regularization of the loss function, and the steps of target detection. The proposed method was proved effective through experiments. The research results provide a reference for the application of head posture recognition in other fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it