Report on “Neuropsychoanalysis around the world,” an online meeting hosted by the International Neuropsychoanalysis Society, July 2020
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 21st Congress of the International Neuropsychoanalysis Society was scheduled to happen on July 9th to 11th in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The coronavirus pandemic led to postponing the event for 2021 and left the Society without its annual meeting. As the world quickly moved on to online communications, the organizing committee decided to have an event in lieu of the Congress on July 11th and 12th. It was titled “Neuropsychoanalysis around the world” and it saw a large audience (approximately 357 people) from all over the world, including Lithuania, Brazil, Argentina, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Israel, Colombia, Canada, Australia, Germany, Austria, Italy, Uruguay, Turkey, Sweden, Puerto Rico, Spain, Japan, South Africa, Belgium, Chile, Finland, Greece, Ireland, Latvia, the Netherlands, Peru, Norway, Portugal, Switzerland, Ukraine and Mexico. Updates in research, clinical advances, and theory were presented to be followed by comments and discussions from attendees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it