MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113025901 · doi:10.2979/aleph.20.1-2.0007

Joseph ben Solomon Ṭaiṭaṣaq on the Construction of an Astrolabe: Study, Diplomatic Edition, and Annotated Translation

2020· article· en· W3113025901 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rodríguez-Arribas, Kozodoy

Bibliographic record

VenueAleph · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Linguistic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArts and Humanities Research Council
KeywordsAstrolabeCatalanQuarter (Canadian coin)Extant taxonClassicsHistoryFifteenthArtLiteratureArt historyArchaeologyHumanitiesAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents the Hebrew edition and English translation of a treatise on the construction of an astrolabe composed by Joseph ben Solomon Ṭaiṭaṣaq in the last quarter of the fifteenth century, extant in a single manuscript never previously studied. This article ties the astrolabe described by Ṭaiṭaṣaq to a specific tradition of astrolabe construction, which is reflected in two components of the rete and is also witnessed in the Middle Ages in a single Latin/Catalan astrolabe preserved at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. Ṭaiṭaṣaq's instrument and the Catalan astrolabe share two remarkable and unique characteristics which may suggest a common literary source for their construction, a common astrolabe workshop, or a common craftsman tradition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlephSame topicHistorical and Linguistic StudiesFrench-language works237,207