MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113034620 · doi:10.26522/vp.v17i2.2605

Revendication et expression de liberté dans les dramaturgies africaines postcoloniales chez Sony Labou Tansi et Bottey Zadi Zaourou

2020· article· fr· W3113034620 on OpenAlex
French French

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix Plurielles · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’Afrique, depuis les indépendances, vise à authentifier sa liberté par la voie de la littérature, notamment le théâtre. Si les dramaturges africains dits de la première génération l’ont affirmée en créant suivant les modèles de création théâtrale hérités de l’Occident, ceux dits de la deuxième génération, se sont frayé une voie totalement nouvelle dans l’écriture théâtrale. Cette voie nouvelle est surtout subversive car les seconds reprochent aux premiers leur conformisme aveugle aux modèles de création d’origine occidentale. Leur souci majeur est d’affranchir l’écriture théâtrale africaine des conventions établies, des formes stéréotypées et de la rigidité de la langue française et lui donner une coloration plus africaine.
 
 Mots-clés : Conformisme, Canons dramaturgiques établis, Transgression, Innovations dramaturgiques, Liberté dramaturgique, Identité africaine

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it