MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113034638 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3043525

Wide Field of View Retrodirective Millimeter Wave Antenna Array With Pulse Modulation and Orthogonal Polarization States

2020· article· en· W3113034638 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmed B. Numan, Jean‐François Frigon, Jean‐Jacques Laurin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPolarization (electrochemistry)Orthogonal polarization spectral imagingOpticsExtremely high frequencyAmplifierArray gainGratingComputer scienceAntenna (radio)Antenna arrayLinear polarizationPhysicsElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents novel techniques to realize a retrodirective millimeter wave antenna array with wide field of view. High gain arrays in phase conjugate configuration are used in combination with orthogonal polarization states and a novel pulse modulation technique to improve backscattering which finds its application in localization and enabling data transmission from sensor nodes. The proposed approach avoids the use of amplifiers thereby reducing the cost, complexity and power consumption of sensor nodes while providing a wide field of view. The basic building blocks of the proposed antenna array are compact one-dimensional (1D) slot arrays that can be designed with orthogonal linear polarizations. Their compact size limits the grating lobes under -10 dB level with respect to the main beam to enable 120° retroreflective field of view, thus, eliminating the reflections in undesired directions while providing 90° rotated linear polarization for the reflected signal with respect to the incident signal polarization. The orthogonal polarization states and compact size are achieved by using a two-layer structure and exploiting the characteristics of substrate integrated waveguide and rectangular cavities. Arrays are designed, prototyped and characterized to validate the proposed concepts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207