Entre <i>prized content</i> et <i>lesbian multicasting</i> : étude comparative entre la saison 1 et la saison 2 de la série web québécoise <i>Féminin/Féminin</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article seeks to place the Féminin/Féminin web series (Chloé Robichaud, 2014 and 2018) within the Quebec media ecosystem and to think, through this case study, of the potential of the web as a platform for the dissemination of queer serial fiction written, directed, and produced by women in Quebec. This study examines more specifically the formal and discursive implications in Robichaud’s work between a first season that was produced for the independent community website Lez Spread the Word (LSTW) and a second season that was broadcast on the largest digital broadcasting platform in Quebec – Tou.tv. The visibility of a multiplicity of queer subjectivities certainly made history in Quebec television. However, by paying particular attention to the production budgets of seasons 1 and 2 as well as to their distribution space and by carrying out a comparative analysis of the narrative structures and images of lesbian characters in seasons 1 and 2 through the lens of the Queer Art of Failure (Halberstam), this article gives a better understanding of the programming of this series as “prized content” (Lotz) for season 1 and as “lesbian multicasting” (Himberg) for season 2. The study of this first queer Quebec television fiction makes an inventory of the post-network era in Quebec possible. This era, through its explosion of audiences, would promise more diverse and inclusive television for marginalized identities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".