Bibliographic record
Abstract
My dietetics career at Ryerson University (1970-2004) was profoundly influenced by feminism and critical theory, as well as involvement with home economics, health promotion and food security.Both dietetics and home economics professionals are faced with conflicts between the dominant (male) structures of knowledge and practice and the lived experience (predominantly female) of addressing the problems of everyday life - especially food. In reflecting on my practice as teacher, administrator (program director and dean) and advocate (within the profession and the community), the model I developed for a professional Practice course offered a helpful framework. The model assumes a constant interaction between the personal and the professional - and proposes these four dimensions of our being for reflection on both our personal lives and our professional practice: (1) learner, (2) citizen, (3) "body and soul" and (4) "actor in the formal economy." The paper offers a personal retrospective on both food security in Toronto (Part I) and dietetic education (Part II).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.066 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".