MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113181710 · doi:10.29173/cjnser.2020v11n2a397

Community Economic Development – A Viable Solution for COVID Recovery

2020· article· en· W3113181710 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Raissa Marks, Michael Toye

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of nonprofit and social economy research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCommunity Development and Social Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Economic growthHumanitiesEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic has laid bare many of the weaknesses in our social and economic systems, exacerbating someof these challenges and drawing attention to others as we, collectively, find a way forward that results in a sustainable,inclusive, and equitable future for all. Around the world, community economic development (CED) initiatives already fosterinclusive economic revitalization, access to capital for business development, local ownership of resources, job creation,poverty reduction, and environmental stewardship. At a larger scale, CED can provide the foundation for COVID-19 recovery. This article outlines key policy proposals for CED-based recovery in Canada and elsewhere. Through the lens ofreconciliation with Indigenous Peoples, intersectionality, and a just transition to a low-carbon future, the CanadianCommunity Economic Development Network proposes the implementation of a national social innovation and social finance strategy and other complementary proposals for a post-COVID-19 world.La pandémie de COVID-19 a mis à nu plusieurs des faiblesses de nos systèmes sociaux et économiques, exacerbantcertains de ces défis et attirant l’attention sur d’autres alors que nous trouvons collectivement une façon d’aller de l’avantqui mènera vers un avenir viable, inclusif et équitable pour tous et toutes. Partout dans le monde, les initiatives dedéveloppement économique communautaire (DÉC) favorisent déjà la revitalisation économique inclusive, l’accès auxcapitaux pour le développement d’entreprise, la propriété locale des ressources, la création d’emploi, la réduction de lapauvreté et l’intendance environnementale. À une plus grande échelle, le DÉC peut fournir la fondation pour la relancesuite à la COVID-19. Ce document présente des principales recommandations de politiques pour la relance basée surle DEC au Canada et ailleurs. En tenant compte de trois exigences—la réconciliation avec les peuples autochtones,l’intersectionnalité et une transition équitable vers un avenir à faible émission de carbone, le Réseau canadien dedéveloppement économique communautaire propose la mise en oeuvre d’une stratégie nationale d’innovation sociale etde financement social et d’autres propositions complémentaires pour un monde post-COVID-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.019
Scholarly communication0.0160.014
Open science0.0040.027
Research integrity0.0110.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.308
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.033 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of nonprofit and social economy researchSame topicCommunity Development and Social ImpactFrench-language works237,207