MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113191310 · doi:10.24843/ach.2017.v04.i02.p02

UJI KERENTANAN NYAMUK AEDES SP. TERHADAP FOGGING INSEKTISIDA MELATHION 5% DI WILAYAH KOTA DENPASAR TAHUN 2016

2020· article· id· W3113191310 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueARCHIVE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDengue and Mosquito Control Research
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToxicologyBiologyTraditional medicineVeterinary medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRAKNyamuk Aedes sp. adalah vektor penyakit Demam Berdarah Dengue (DBD) di Indonesia. Salah satu pengendalian vektor DBD adalah dengan melakukan fogging menggunakan insektisida. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tingkat kerentanan nyamuk Aedes sp. terhadap fogging insektisida melathion 5% di wilayah kota Denpasar sebagai daerah endemis DBD. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian eksperimental murni dengan rancangan penelitian post-test only with control group design. Jumlah sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah 200 ekor nyamuk dewasa yang dibagi ke dalam kerangka besi masing-masing 25 ekor. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nyamuk Aedes sp. masih rentan terhadap insektisida melathion dengan konsentrasi 5% dengan kematian 100% dalam waktu 60 menit di dalam maupun di luar ruangan rumah. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa daya bunuh fogging insektisida melathion 5% terhadap nyamuk Aedes sp. di wilayah Kota Denpasar secara umum masih efektif dan tidak terdapat perbedaan daya bunuh fogging insektisida melathion 5% terhadap nyamuk Aedes sp. di dalam rumah dengan di luar rumah.Keywords: Aedes sp, Melathion, Resistensi.
 ABSTRACTAedes Sp. Is a vector of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) in Indonesia. Among many ways to control DHF, fogging technique using Insecticides is commonly used. The purpose is this study was to determine susceptibility of the Aedes sp. against fogging of 5% malathion insecticide in the Denpasar city area as a DHF endemic area. This research is a pure experimental research with post-test only with control group design. The number of samples used in this study were 200 adult mosquitoes which were divided into an iron frame of 25 individuals each. The study showed that the Aedes sp. still susceptible to malathion insecticide with a concentration of 5% with 100% death within 60 minutes inside and outside the home. Based on the study it can be concluded that fogging technique using 5% Malathion is effective to kill Aedes Sp. The study also found that there is no difference result of killing power by applying 5% Malathion inside and outside the house.Keywords: Aedes Sp., Malathion, Resistance

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it