Addressing the elephant in the room: integrating sexual health practice in spinal cord injury rehabilitation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Sexual health, a basic human right, maybe disrupted after a spinal cord injury (SCI) and is often not addressed in rehabilitation. This quality improvement initiative embedded sexual health education and support for patients with SCI into clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2017-2018 a team of clinicians, researchers and persons with SCI developed and implemented a new sexual health practice in SCI rehabilitation. A systematic process was undertaken which included implementation science principles; the PLISSIT model and Sexual Rehabilitation Framework were foundational to the new practice. RESULTS: Adult inpatients with SCI began receiving the sexual health practice in June 2018. After 6 months, patient and health care provider surveys were conducted. Patients reported increased awareness of sexual health resources and increased satisfaction with sexual health concerns being addressed. Clinicians reported increased comfort in addressing patients' sexual health concerns and increased awareness of sexual health resources. CONCLUSIONS: Embedding the new sexual health practice facilitates the reintegration of sexual health into the daily lives of SCI patients and supports a more comprehensive and holistic rehabilitation. It normalizes sexual health concerns and questions in an SCI rehabilitation facility.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONSexual health is noted to be a top priority among persons with spinal cord injury, however, this area of care is often overlooked by healthcare providers across the rehabilitation continuum.A team of clinicians, researchers, and persons with SCI used a systematic process to address this gap by developing and implementing a new sexual health practice in the SCI rehabilitation program.This quality improvement initiative resulted in increased clinician knowledge and confidence in this domain of practice and greater patient satisfaction in having their sexual health needs to be addressed during rehabilitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.055 | 0.055 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".