MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113230996 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3042831

Outage-Constrained Robust Multigroup Multicast Beamforming for Satellite-Based Internet of Things Coexisting With Terrestrial Networks

2020· article· en· W3113230996 on OpenAlexaff
Yan Yan, Kang An, Bangning Zhang, Wei‐Ping Zhu, Guoru Ding, Daoxing Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationBeamformingMulticastOptimization problemTransmitter power outputChannel (broadcasting)Distributed computingComputer networkAlgorithmTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Satellite-based Internet of Things (IoT) is recognized as a cost-effective approach for global access. In this article, we aim at improving the spectrum efficiency of satellite systems to serve a huge number of IoT devices. To this end, we present a cognitive satellite-terrestrial framework, where a multibeam satellite system with full frequency reuse shares the spectrum with terrestrial networks based on the underlay paradigm. Considering DVB-S2X recommendations, geometric configurations, and channel characteristics, we investigate a robust multigroup multicast beamforming design for the satellite-based IoT coexisting with terrestrial networks in the presence of a phase error on channel state information, and characterize the achievable rate region under the outage probability constraint for the terminal and the power consumption constraint for the satellite. Based on the concept of rate profile, an associated optimization problem is formulated to design robust beamformers and determine the Pareto boundary of the region. To solve the intractable problem, we propose a two-level iterative algorithm on the basis of joint bisection search and penalty function enabled nonsmooth optimization. In particular, we develop a Bernstein-type inequality aided method and a large deviation inequality aided method to obtain a tractable and conservative approximation for the probabilistic constraint, respectively. Numerical results are provided to confirm the validity and superiority of our proposed scheme over the existing approaches and reveal the impact of key parameters on the achievable system performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207