MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113241601 · doi:10.24953/turkjped.2020.06.001

Neurocognitive abilities in individuals with Down syndrome-a narrative review

2020· review· en· W3113241601 on OpenAlexaff
Sidra Kaleem Jafri, Karen Harman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Turkish Journal of Pediatrics · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDown syndrome and intellectual disability research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurocognitiveIntellectual disabilityPsychomotor learningDown syndromePsychologyDevelopmental psychologyBorderline intellectual functioningTrisomyLearning disabilityExecutive functionsSpecific language impairmentWilliams syndromePsychomotor disorderCognitionClinical psychologyCognitive psychologyPsychiatryGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Down syndrome (DS), or trisomy 21, is the most common genetic syndrome associated with intellectual disability. Despite the variability in expression, there is a distinct developmental phenotype characterized by deficits in learning/memory, executive functions, and language skills accompanying the psychomotor delay. The severity of intellectual impairment has the dominant effect on functioning, other influences such as parental and societal attitudes, supports available and social opportunities also play a role in the attainment of skills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Turkish Journal of PediatricsSame topicDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchFrench-language works237,207