Baseline findings of the Filipino Multicomponent Intervention to Maintain Cognitive Performance among High‐Risk Populations (FINOMAIN) study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background FINOMAIN is an on‐going community study which integrates nutrition counselling (“the Philippine plate” or pinggang Pinoy), standard vascular care, and physical exercise in the form of a ballroom dance protocol known as INDAK (Improving Neurocognition through Dance and Kinesthetics). The multicomponent intervention will last for 48 weeks. Nutrition counselling and standard vascular care are given every third month, and INDAK is given twice a week for 60 minutes each session. Method FINOMAIN is a two‐arm, single‐blind, cluster randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent intervention to prevent cognitive decline among at‐risk elderly. A total sample of 71 participants (intervention=38, control=33) from 8 community clusters in Quezon City, Metro Manila joined the pilot study. Baseline data included demographics, cognitive profile, behavioural and functional profile, anthropometric measures, and medical and laboratory measures. Result The comprehensive assessment included (1) cognitive measures (Clinical Dementia Rating‐Sum of Boxes, Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale‐Cog, Alzheimer’s Disease 8, Montreal Cognitive Assessment‐Philippines, Mini Mental State Examination‐Philippines, Verbal Fluency [animal and vegetables categories], Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Trail Making Test A and B, Number Cancellation Task, Logical Memory [immediate recall, delayed recall, and recognition], Digit Span [forward and backward], and Boston Naming Test), (2) behavioural and functional measures (Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Geriatric Depression Scale, EQVAS Health‐Related Quality‐of‐Life, Lawton’s Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, Disability Assessment for Dementia, Time Up and Go, Sit to Stand Test, Grip strength, Tinetti Balance and Gait, and Berg Balance Scale), (3) anthropometric measures, and (4) medical and laboratory measures (lipid profile, cholesterol level, fasting blood glucose, vitamin B deficiency, osteoarthritis, anemia, depression episode history, alcohol use, smoking history, and blood amyloid [MDS‐AD test]). The intervention and control groups are comparable in all baseline measures (p’s>0.05). A random sample of 38 was drawn from 52 individuals who attended an 8‐week INDAK training, to compose the intervention group. Compliance to INDAK protocol was 97.4% (>/=80%). Conclusion FINOMAIN is a much‐needed study to confirm the efficacy of multicomponent interventions in preventing cognitive decline among at‐risk elderly in a community setting. Data can be compared with other multicomponent programmes to select the most effective interventions for specific at‐risk populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".