MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113315727 · doi:10.1002/alz.046589

Medial temporal neuroinflammation unleashes tau spreading over the neocortex

2020· article· en· W3113315727 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tharick A. Pascoal, Min Su Kang, Joseph Therriault, Andréa Lessa Benedet, Mira Chamoun, Firoza Z Lussier, Cécile Tissot, Sulantha Mathotaarachchi, Jenna Stevenson, Gassan Massarweh, Jean‐Paul Soucy, Serge Gauthier, Pedro Rosa‐Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill Genome CentreMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeocortexNeuroinflammationTranslocator proteinPsychologyNeuroscienceBiologyDiseasePathologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Transentorhinal tau neurofibrillary tangles deposition is a typical finding in cognitively unimpaired (CU) elderly. Thus, how tau tangle spreads over the neocortex, leading to disease progression, is a pressing issue in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although amyloid is postulated to trigger this spread, the fact that amyloid deposition is present in low concentrations in temporal structures challenges this framework. Here, we tested the hypothesis that brain amyloid burden interacts with medial temporal neuroinflammation unleashing tau spread over the neocortex. To assess neuroinflammation, we used [11C]PBR28 PET, a ligand that binds to the 18‐kDa translocator protein(TSPO), considerate a proxy of inflammation. Methods TSPO polymorphism (rs6971) was genotyped in 678 participants from the Montreal catchment area (48% presented rs6971 polymorphism of high TSPO binders). Following inclusion/exclusion criteria, we studied 131 high TSPO binders (22 CU young, 63 CU elderly, 28 MCI, 18 AD). All individuals had PET; amyloid [18F]NAV4694, tau [18F]MK6240, and [11C]PBR28,as well as MRI, cognitive and genetic assessments. Structural equation modeling (SEM) tested associations between markers. Results [11C]PBR28 uptake was progressively higher from CU to AD(Fig.1). [18F]NAV4694,[18F]MK6240, and [11C]PBR28 were correlated (Fig.2); however, analysis of variance suggested that an interaction between [18F]NAV4694and[11C]PBR28 on [18F]MK6240 best explain the association between these markers(P<0.0001). Voxel‐wise analysis, taking into consideration global and local tracer effects, suggests an interaction between global [18F]NAV4694 and medial temporal [11C]PBR28 on medial temporal [18F]MK6240(Fig.3). Stratified analysis revealed that individuals with abnormal amyloid, tau, and neuroinflammation (A+/T+/NI+) had elevated cognitive impairment and hippocampus atrophy(Fig.4). SEM suggests that global amyloid interacts with transentorhinal inflammation leading to tau spread over Braak II‐III(Fig.5). Subsequently, tau hierarchically spread from Braak III to VI. Models inverting the variables mentioned above or the order of Braak regions did not fit the data. Accumulation of tau only in Braak IV‐VI was associated with cognitive symptoms (Fig.6). Conclusion Our results suggest that an interaction between global amyloid and medial temporal neuroinflammation triggers tau spread over the neocortex. Global amyloid may represent distant amyloid load or amyloid oligomers. Our results suggest individuals with tau deposition confined to transentorhinal cortex as targets for the use of anti‐inflammatory drugs in AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207