Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study draws the following conclusion through the analysis method of literature review. At present, the most important factor that hinders China becoming a financial superpower is the increase of the control of capital outflow, what will weaken the trust between the capital outflow country and foreign investors, and destroy the relationship established by the country on the international platform. In addition, China’s aging population increases the huge debt increase is also the reason why it is difficult to becomes a financial superpower. This paper puts forward some remedial measures for these challenges. One way is one belt and one road initiative to reduce state control of capital and regulate the monetary system. These actions will help China compete with other developed countries as a financial superpower. There are three reasons for this conclusion. Firstly, when compared to other global superpowers like the United States and the United Kingdom, China is still lagging behind in terms of its GDP. Moreover, the state has monopolized a lot of financial decisions in the country such as capital outflows and therefore curbing economic growth. Thirdly, the State control has spilled over to the foreign exchange market and the country has been known to limit its currency lending capacity. Therefore, the internalization of their currency has halted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".