MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113374056 · doi:10.1080/03069885.2020.1857334

Revitalising decent work through inclusion: toward relational understanding and action

2020· article· en· W3113374056 on OpenAlexafffund
Richard A. Young, José F. Domene, L. Alejandra Botia, Mindy Ming-Jung Chiang, Mathew R. Gendron, Kesha Pradhan

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Guidance and Counselling · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Welfare and Adoption
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMeaning (existential)Intervention (counseling)Action (physics)Inclusion (mineral)Work (physics)Relational theoryGrounded theoryRelation (database)PsychologySocial workSociologyEpistemologySocial psychologyPolitical sciencePsychotherapistQualitative researchSocial scienceComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To address the challenges of realising decent work, Contextual Action Theory (CAT) is proposed as an innovative, relational approach. Grounded on the notion of goal-directed actions that occur in daily life, many involving significant others, the approach provides a framework for a relationally oriented supportive counselling intervention that shifts the emphasis to one's relation with others as the way in which one constructs meaning in life and work. This intervention is illustrated with a case of young immigrants in pursuit of decent work as they transition to a new country. Strengths, limitations, and future directions of the approach are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Guidance and CounsellingSame topicChild Welfare and AdoptionFrench-language works237,207