Low-Profile Uniplanar Dual-Band and Dual- Polarized Microstrip Patch Antenna Using Embedded MTM-EBGs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents the design and fabrication of a novel uniplanar microstrip patch antenna that is simultaneously dual-band and dual-polarized. By embedding a carefully designed metamaterial-based electromagnetic bandgap structure (MTM-EBG) into the edges of a conventional square patch, operation with orthogonal linear polarizations at both 3.6 and 5.8 GHz is achieved. The design is fully printed, compact, low-profile, and pin-fed using a shielded microstrip configuration, and it is 17% smaller than a conventional square patch at the lower operating frequency. The presented antenna shows a reflection coefficient better than -16 dB at each frequency and over 24 dB of port-to-port isolation. Radiation patterns are patch-like in both operating bands, with broadside gains of 6.4 and 5.3 dBi at the lower and higher operating frequencies, respectively. The antenna is fabricated using conventional PCB manufacturing methods, and measurement results are in very good agreement with simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".