MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113465164 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-25852/v1

Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Nutritional Status of Women in Pakistan: Secondary Analysis from Pakistan National Nutrition Survey

2020· preprint· en· W3113465164 on OpenAlexaff
Kamran Sadiq, Bushra Mahmood, Sumra Kureishy, Shabina Ariff, Ghulam Mustafa, Gul Nawaz Khan, Muhammad Umer, Zahid Memon, Naveed Z. Janjua, Sajid Soofi, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square (Research Square) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverweightUnderweightBody mass indexObesityMedicineSocioeconomic statusDemographyEnvironmental healthGerontologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Pakistan is experiencing a rapid nutrition transition with a shift from underweight to overweight and obesity. This paper will examine the role of household socioeconomic position (SEP), community SEP and urbanicity on the nutritional status (underweight, overweight and obesity) of Pakistani women. Methods: We analysed data on 34,391 women aged ≥20 years enrolled in 2011 National Nutritional Survey of Pakistan (NNS). The NNS is a nationally representative survey employing a multistage stratified cluster sampling design. We assessed household SEP through a wealth index constructed using items from household possessions, utilities and housing conditions. We assessed the relationship of urbanicity, household and community SEP with categories of body mass index (BMI) using multinomial logistic regression where normal BMI (18.6-22.5 kg/m 2 ) was the reference category. Results: Overall, 15% of women were underweight (BMI<18.5 kg/m 2 ), 14% were pre-overweight (BMI 23.00-24.9 kg/m 2 ), 22% were overweight (BMI 25.0-29.99 kg/m 2 ) and 12% were obese (BMI≥30.0 kg/m 2 ). Households with higher SEP were associated with increased levels of overweight-1 (aOR: 2.91; 95%CI: 2.41-3.50), overweight-2 (aOR: 4.15; 95%CI: 3.31-5.19) and obesity (aOR: 6.20; 95%CI: 4.92-7.81) among women. Women were more likely to be obese in major urban (aOR: 2.34; 95%CI: 2.02-2.71) and urban (aOR: 1.84; 95%CI: 1.62-2.09) areas compared to rural areas. At the community level, communities in rural areas were more likely to have higher levels of underweight, while communities in urban areas were more likely to have higher levels of obesity. Furthermore, the likelihood of underweight and overweight women coexisting within the same community was low in major urban (r=0.67), urban (r=0.55) and rural (r=0.54) areas. Conclusions: In Pakistan, overweight and obesity among women is associated with urbanicity and household and community SEP. Women living in urban areas with high household and community SEP were associated with higher levels of overweight and obesity. Our findings suggest the importance of interventions targeting undernutrition in rural areas and overnutrition in urban areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square (Research Square)Same topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207