Refining the general comparison theorem for the Klein–Gordon equation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By recasting the Klein–Gordon equation as an eigen-equation in the coupling parameter [Formula: see text] the basic Klein–Gordon comparison theorem may be written [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are the monotone nondecreasing shapes of two central potentials [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] on [Formula: see text]. Meanwhile, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are the corresponding coupling parameters that are functions of the energy [Formula: see text]. We weaken the sufficient condition for the ground-state spectral ordering by proving (for example in [Formula: see text] dimension) that if [Formula: see text], the couplings remain ordered [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are the ground-states corresponding, respectively to the couplings [Formula: see text] for a given [Formula: see text]. This result is extended to spherically symmetric radial potentials in [Formula: see text] dimensions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".