MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Midinfrared Emission and Absorption in Strained and Relaxed Direct-Band-Gap <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><mml:msub><mml:mi>Ge</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Sn</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math> Semiconductors

2021· article· lv· W3113651232 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Applied · 2021
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceAbsorption (acoustics)Relaxation (psychology)PhotonicsSemiconductorStrain (injury)Range (aeronautics)Work (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By independently engineering strain and composition, this work demonstrates and investigates direct-band-gap emission in the midinfrared range from ${\mathrm{Ge}}_{1\text{\ensuremath{-}}x}{\mathrm{Sn}}_{x}$ layers grown on silicon. We extend the room-temperature emission wavelength above approximately 4.0 \textmu{}m upon postgrowth strain relaxation in layers with uniform Sn content of 17 at.%. The fundamental mechanisms governing the optical emission are discussed based on temperature-dependent photoluminescence, absorption measurements, and theoretical simulations. Regardless of strain and composition, these analyses confirm that single-peak emission is always observed in the probed temperature range of 4--300 K, ruling out defect- and impurity-related emission. Moreover, carrier losses into thermally activated nonradiative recombination channels are found to be greatly minimized as a result of strain relaxation. Absorption measurements validate the direct band-gap in strained and relaxed samples at energies closely matching photoluminescence data. These results highlight the strong potential of ${\mathrm{Ge}}_{1\text{\ensuremath{-}}x}{\mathrm{Sn}}_{x}$ semiconductors as versatile building blocks for scalable, compact, and silicon-compatible midinfrared photonics and quantum optoelectronics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review AppliedSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207